Wolf's Web

AIM Facebook Goodreads LinkedIn MSN Messenger Other Other Skype StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by TypePad

    Merit Badges

    Plowshares and Pruning Hooks

    July 24, 2008

    Free-Book-of-the-Week Club: Advice for Advisors in China

    Outside Tower 2, China World Beijing

    Waiting for the air to clear

    1139 hrs.

    Much of the work that we foreign-born and foreign-educated types do here in China is of a consulting or mentoring nature. Indeed, if foreigners have any long-term value in corporate China beyond serving as trans-cultural connective tissue , much of it lies in our ability to serve as conduits for soft skills like leadership, creativity, quality control, project management, and the like to the nation's growing ranks of executives and professionals.

    A View to a Skill

    Success in these roles means mastering an important but poorly-understood skill set. Whether serving as an advisor to the localized operations of a foreign multinational, as a quality inspector in a factory, a consultant to a Chinese firm expanding overseas, or as a mentor to talented young professionals, the way we deliver our counsel is as important - and in some cases, more important - than the information we deliver.

    Sadly, the set of skills one requires to be an effective counselor, mentor or consultant is taught in only a tiny number of the world's business schools. It is as if these institutions - training grounds, as it were, for ranks of future consultants - assume that as long as the fundamental business knowledge is duly inculcated into their students, they will somehow magically graduate with the ability to appropriately, tactfully, and effectively passing on their acquired wisdom.

    Worse, a discouraging number of professional advisory firms - not just management consultants, but law firms, advertising agencies, accounting firms, I.T. consultancies, and public relations agencies - also give short shrift to teaching advisory skills to their new hires. Off go their consultants, filled with knowledge and wisdom and no idea how to deliver it with the skill and grace to ensure its effectiveness.

    The Missing Manual

    The prolific professional-services guru David Meister has begun the effort to fill this vast gap, most notably with his work The Trusted Advisor (co-authored with Charles Green and Robert Galford), a book that should be required reading in any advice-giving firm. While providing an incomparable framework for building trust and selling yourself as an advisor, the book falls somewhat short on how to deliver good advice effectively.

    Especially missing in Maister's work and that of others is how do deal with the challenge of giving such advice across a cultural divide - a particularly thorny problem here in China.

    The good news is that there is a corpus of literature available to help, from the people who have been advising across cultures for decades: the military.

    The U.S. military has been sending trained officers and senior non-commissioned officers into the field around the world as advisors to local military leaders since well before World War II. The British have been doing it for even longer than that.

    And keep in mind that when these people give advice, it is serious business. When we provide advice, money and companies are at stake. When the military provides advice to senior officers of another country, the stakes are far higher.

    Wisdom from the GWOT

    Recently, the Yanks began pulling together the collected learning of a century of that experience into a form the rest of us can use. Most notably are two volumes of the U.S. Army's Combat Studies Institute Press' Occasional Paper series on the Long War: Advising Indigenous Forces: American Advisors in Korea, Vietnam, and El Salvador; and Advice for Advisors: Suggestions and Observations from Lawrence to the Present, the first authored and the second edited by Robert Ramsey, a retired US Army officer. (Both books are available as free downloads from the CSI Press website.)

    Despite the ungainly titles, these are easy and fast reads. The first volume, Advising Indigenous Forces, is largely an exploration of the American experience in advising since Korea. Before you start, set aside whatever political issues you might have with these conflicts or America's role in them - they will only get in the way of you learning from the tactical, on the ground experience of people sent to advise strangers from a foreign culture.

    The first two-thirds of the book will recount the experiences in detail so as to set up the last third of the book, which uses the conflicts as a means of deriving some extremely helpful lessons. It is worth slogging through - the insights and advice are poignant.

    The second book, Advice for Advisors, is meant as a companion volume to the first, with fourteen supplementary articles fro men who had been advisors in the field, starting with World War I and moving through Iraq. The first article, for example, is "Twenty-Seven Articles" by T.E. Lawrence, more widely known as "Lawrence of Arabia." For reasons that don't bear going into here, I am not a fan of Lawrence, despite having read his book, The Seven Pillars of Wisdom. Nonetheless, his simple list of dos and don'ts elegantly encapsulates his learnings from years of field experience.

    Another notable article in this volume is Edward Stewart's "American Advisors Overseas. From his position on the faculty of George Washington University, Dr. Stewart was one of the pioneers in cross-cultural communications and wrote one of the continuing classic texts in the field, and his article underscores how important it is to know your own prejudices and cultural issues before embarking on an advisory effort.

    If you are in an advisory or mentoring position - or want to be - these are both worthy additions to your reading list. The price is certainly right (and much cheaper than one of my training courses on the same topic.)

    July 21, 2008

    Why I study war (and why you should, too)

    Starbucks Lido

    Blogging on the BlackBerry

    0921 hrs.

    In the midst of a discussion about business in China, a friend of mine and I had reached that point in the conversation where the talk was either on the verge of becoming profound or it was about to descend into arcana.

    The discourse paused for a moment while the waitress brought our drinks. There was a relaxed pause as we each caught our mental breath.

    "I've been meaning to ask you a question for a long time," he said. "Why do you read so much about war?"

    Yes, why?

    It was one of those questions that slams your brain into a hard left turn, not just because it was a hefty change in the direction of the conversation, but because it cut right into me. With all the books, blogs, papers, webcasts, magazine and newspaper articles on China, business, marketing, strategy, and communications out there, what the hell am I doing studying military science, military history, and international security?

    I gave a flippant answer: "I enjoy it," and quickly returned to the previous topic. But there is more to it than just the recreational value.
    Truth is, after three decades studying the martial sciences and two decades in business, I have discovered that not only does "studying war" enrich the development of business leaders, but also that a lot of businesspeople and companies desperately need a mental dose of modern military thinking.

    Swords into pruning hooks

    Let's address the question of morality first, as I am painfully aware that many people equate the study of war with the dangerous propigation of man's warlike instinct.

    What is gained from the study of a subject depends entirely on the intent of the student. You can study anthrax with a view to using it to kill others, or you can study it so as to develop a cure, or to eliminate it and other infectuous diseases. In the same way, you can study war to help you plan an insurrection, organize a terrorist network, or invade a country. You can also study war to end an insurgency and what drives it, or defend a country from external threats.

    Or you can study war as I do: to gain insights that can be intelligently applied in more peaceful endeavors. In fact, I think studying studying war is a moral imperative, even if the very idea of killing people and breaking things nauseates you - especially if killing people and breaking things nauseates you.

    War's immense cost to mankind in blood and treasure through history is staggering. For us to waste any opportunity to derive whatever benefit possible that can be derived from that experience is unconscionable. A moral person may recoil from the ravages of war, yet acknowledge that we are ethically bound to extract from its study any lessons, innovations, models, or giudance that can be put to peaceful, productice, positive use.

    Business and war

    Of all fields that martial endeavors have influenced, perhaps the most compelling - and controversial - is how it influences business.

    Drawing equivalence between war and business is an imperfect comparison at best. You may not buy the idea that "business is the moral equivalent of war," but like war business is fundamentally conflict and competition between groups for tangible ends. War is usually kinetic (the military's way of saying that it involves killing people and breaking things), and business is rarely kinetic, but there are enough parallels that key lessons can be shared between the two fields.

    War and commerce are both conducted in the face of great uncertainty where the participants usually have a lot - or everything - at stake. Freedom of action is restricted - or enabled - by a series of factors outside the control of the individual. Time is insufficient, resources limited, and stress is high. The cost of failure, while not quite as severe in business as combat, is nonetheless high and very real.

    Creating the business strategos

    The first and most obvious way a study of war can enrich a business mind is in strategy, or, more specifically, helping a businessperson become a strategist - or at least a strategic thinker. In no field is strategy as important - nor the strategic art as well understood - than in the military, and the warrior-scholars (no, that is not an oxymoron) of history have added more good thinking to the field than all of the business thinkers put together.

    For example, you probably know people who have read (or who have claimed to read) Sun Tzu's The Art of War. Long before Michael Douglas quoted Lao Sun while playing Gordon Gecko in the film "Wall Street," businessmen were tapping the ancient wisdom to inform their thinking. (Just a thought - anyone who actually did read Sun Tzu and took it to heart would never be caught quoting him. Why, after all let your opponent know how you think?)

    The point is that Sun Tzu - a military scientist, after all - probably wrote the capstone text in business strategy, yet he was never even thinking about business. The reason his thinking is accepted in commerce is because generations of businesspeople had the foresight to recognize that good thinking, regardless of its origin, is what you need to succeed in business.

    But wait...there's more...

    So why stop at strategy? (For that matter, I wonder why most businesspeople go no further into the martial realm than Sun Tzu for their strategy, but that's a subject for another post.) There are a host of other areas where the military experience can enrich business thinking.

    Take marketing, for example. Jay Conrad Levinson has made a career taking the simple ideas of guerrilla warfare - fighting larger rivals with unlimited resources when you have almost none - and applying them to marketing. Less known (for now) but equally wise Mike Smock has taken the theories of Sun Tzu and strategic visionary John Boyd and incorporated them into his Attack Marketing approach.

    Just as marketing can benefit from a little martial thinking, so can consulting, managing global and dispersed enterprises, communications (internal and external), event management, and a host of specialty areas like medicine, telecommunications, and network theory.

    There are entire spheres of business operations where the armed forces - especially those of the west - continue to match if not lead enterprise in the development of new thinking and approaches. Logistics and supply chain management, recruiting, training, intelligence, staff functions, career management, and creating and optimizing teams are areas where business owes much to the constant developments in these fields being driven by the armed forces.

    Still not convinced?

    You may be thinking "hey, aren't military types the thick-headed dudes we saw in ROTC who went into the armed forces because they couldn't get into grad school?" While I can't speak for your experience, understand that it's easy to be opinionated when your opinions aren't going to get people killed. The looming specter of death, defeat, and dishonor can turn a rigid thinker into an open-minded scholar awfully quickly.

    Warriors become thinkers by necessity, not by preference. It is fair to say that the United States Marine Corps, for example, is a superb example of The Learning Organization. (Does your company produce a recommended professional reading list that covers each level of the organization? No? The Marines do, and the program has been so effective that all of the rest of the US armed services have picked up the practice.)

    Even if you don't buy the whole business-war parallel, I urge you to pick up the book The Medici Effect. Frans Johansson describes how incorporating ideas from fields unrelated to your own with issues in your own area are a tested and accessible path to innovation. The application of, say, a new history of the Battle of Midway to your day-to-day work may seem counterintuitive, but I'm 100 pages into the book and I've gained insights into Japanese institutional dynamics that for me opened a whole new vista on Asian management. That's "The Medici Effect" at work.

    All the help we can get

    Globalization and the tempo it forces on us has made doing business insanely complex. You especially feel this in China, where the pace is brutal and the conditions in constant flux. Against that context, and particularly as we pause at the edge of what look to be even harder times ahead, we are foolish to ignore any rich vein of insights and approaches to difficult problems.

    June 06, 2008

    Worst places to be a terrorist

    Starbucks Guomao 1
    I should get a bronze plaque on this table
    1334 hrs.

    Foreign Policy magazine (not to be confused with Foreign Affairs, the much-esteemed journal of the Council on Foreign Relations) is a source that is fun to turn to on global topics, taking as it does an approach somewhere between journalism and the deep-thought analysis you find in the weightier Foreign Affairs. 

    (Interestingly, their editor-in-chief did an op-ed in December suggesting that there would be an all-out street battle between activists and police this summer during the Olympics. I, for one, hope FP winds up with an omelet facial.)

    This month they offer a little tidbit: the magazine has rated the worst countries in the world to be a terrorist. The magazine lists five countries whose fight against transnational terrorism involves making "unsavory choices between protecting civil rights and providing security" and who routinely choose the latter over the former. 

    France, Egypt, Singapore, Russia, and Jordan rank at the top of the list. China doesn't make the cut. France, apparently, is far more prepared to toss out the time-honored ideals of "liberte, fraternite, et egalite" to stomp on terror than is the PRC. 

    On the one hand, I find that a comforting confirmation of China's political progress; on another, a possible indictment of how the nation has reacted after 9/11. 

    May 06, 2007

    Cross-post: The real way to stop terrorism

    "All You Need is Love" by Bruce Hoffman in The Atlantic Monthly, December 2001

    In all of the global discussion among defense specialists about how to stop terrorism, digging deep into the history of counterinsurgency, a clue on one highly effective tactic comes from a highly unexpected source.

    At one point, the PLO apparently needed to shut down their own fanatical terrorist unit, Black September.

    How did they do it?

    They set it up so each of the bloodthirsty, testosterone-fuelled and demagogue-gueded young men got married, help starting a new life, kids, and steady, rewarding jobs.

    In other words, Tom Barnett is right. You give the terrorists something to live for through connectivity and hope for a better future, and you will eliminate the problem far more quickly and effectively than you will with brute force alone.

    All of which brings up another point: Hamas and the Palestinian Authority have at their disposal the means to end terrorism now. After all, the Palestinians wrote the book on domesticating wild dogs. The fact that there are still people running around the region with outerwear made from plastic explosives means that they still find these tactics useful.

    For more, read Hoffman's book Inside Terrorism, and Barnett's books The Pentagon's New Map and A Blueprint for Action.